• Okekeifere, Andrew I, “Public Policy and Arbitrability under the UNCITRAL Model Law”, International Arbitration Law Review,1999
  • Ostrovsky , Aaron A. , “How the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine Preserves Core Human Rights within Cultural Diversity and Legitimises International Human Rights Tribunals”, Hanse Law Review, Vol. 1 No. 1, 2005
  • Pinto , Monica,” National and International Courts—Deference or Disdain”, Loyola of Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review,Vol. 30
  • Reiman, Jeffery ,”Privacy, Intimacy and Person hood”, philosophy on public Affairs. No1, 1979
  • Rosendorff ,B Peter , Milner ,Helen V, “The Optimal Design of International Trade Institutions: Uncertainty and Escape”, International Organization, Vol.55 , Issue4, 2001
  • Ryan , Goodman , “Norms and National Security: The WTO as a Catalyst for Inquiry“,Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2001
  • Ryssdall , R., ‘The Coming of Age of the European Convention of Human Rights’ , , European Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 18 ,1996
  • Schermers, Henry G., “The Role of Domistic Courts in Effectuating International Law”, Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 3, No. 1 ,1990
  • Schill ,Stephan , Briese ,Robyn, If the State Considers,” Self-Judging Clauses in International Dispute Settlement”, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law,  ۱۳, ۲۰۰۹
  • Schloemann, H, Ohlhoff , S., “Constitutionalization and Dispute Settlement in the WTO: National Security as an Issue of Competence”, American Journal of International Law , Vol. 93 ,1999
  • Shany ,Yuval ,”Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law?” ,The European Journal of International Law ,Vol. 16 ,No.5 ,2006
  • Shapiro , Scott J. , “The Hart-Dworkin Debate, A Short Guide for the Perplexed“,Yale University – Law School, No. 77 , 2007
  • Smith , Richard “ The Margin of Appreciation and Human Rights Protection in the ‘War on Terror”, Essex Human Rights Review, 2011
  • J.A , “Margins of Appreciation: Cultural Relativity and the European Court of Human Rights in the Post-Cold War Era”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly,2005
  • Sweet ,Alec Stone , Mathews ,Jud , “Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 2008
  • Thomas ,Poole, “The Reformation of English Administrative Law”, Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 68, No. 1, 2009
  • Tomuschat ,Chiristian , “The Lockerbie case before the international court of justice “, international commission of jurists , ۴۸,۱۹۹۲
  • Tümay, Murat,” Margin of Apprecition Doctrin Develop by the Case Law of The European Court of Human Rights”, Ankara Law Review , Vol. 5 ,No. 2 ,2008
  • Waldock , H., “The Effectiveness of the System Set Up by the European Convention of Human Rights”, Human Rights Law Journal, Vol. 1, 1980

 

ج- آراء ((Table of cases
A-European Court of Human Rights

  1. and Others v. the United Kingdom, , judgment of 19 February 2009
  2. V. Norway, Application No. 28070/06 , judgment of 9 April 2009
  3. Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandaly v. The United Kingdom, judgment of 28.05.1985
  4. Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919).
  5. Ahmed v. Austria, judgment of 17.12.1996
  6. Aksoy v. Turkey , Judgement of 18.12.1996
  7. Al Adsani v. UK, Judgment of 21 November , 2001
  8. Ambruszkiewicz v. Poland, judgment of 04.05.2006
  9. Artico v. Italy, Series A no. 37 , judgment of 13 May 1980
  10. Baragiola v. Switzerland, Judgment of 21.10.1993
  11. Belev and Others v. Bulgaria, Application No. 16354/02, Judgment of 2 April 2009
  12. Belgium v. Belgium, Judgements of 23 July 1968
  13. Benet Czech, spol. s r.o. v. the Czech Republic, 21 October 2010
  14. Brannigan and McBride v. United Kingdom , Judgement of 25 May 1993
  15. Brogan v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 29 November 1988
  16. Campbell v. The United Kingdom, judgment of 25.03.1992
  17. Chahal v. The United Kingdom, judgment of 15 November 1996
  18. Christine Goodwin v. UK, Judgment of 11 July 2002
  19. Colozza v. Italy, Application No. 9024/80, 12 February 1985
  20. Cossey v United Kingdom, judgment 27-09-1990
  21. Darby v. Sweden App , judgment of 23 October 1990
  22. Dickson v. The United Kingdom,judgment of 04.12.2007
  23. Dudgeon v. UK, Judgment of 22 October 1981
  24. Engel and others v. Netherlands, Judgment of 8 June 1976
  25. Eski v. Austria, judgment of 25.04.2007
  26. Ezelin v. France, Judgment of 26 April 1991
  27. Fadeyeva v. Russia, Application No. 55723/00, Judgment of 9 June 2005
موضوعات: بدون موضوع  لینک ثابت


فرم در حال بارگذاری ...